<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: AMA’s National Health Insurer Report Card – $12 Billion Could be Saved Through Increased Claims Automation	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.policymed.com/2013/07/amas-national-health-insurer-report-card-12-billion-could-be-saved-through-increased-claims-automation.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.policymed.com/2013/07/amas-national-health-insurer-report-card-12-billion-could-be-saved-through-increased-claims-automation.html</link>
	<description>Legal, Regulatory, and Compliance Issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2013 12:24:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: John Spek		</title>
		<link>https://www.policymed.com/2013/07/amas-national-health-insurer-report-card-12-billion-could-be-saved-through-increased-claims-automation.html#comment-150</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Spek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2013 12:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.policymed.com/amas-national-health-insurer-report-card-12-billion-could-be-saved-through-increased-claims-automation/#comment-150</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Where are the results for Medicare?
The AMA report on claim denials shows Medicare claim denials - why was Medicare kept off of the Administrative Burden Index?
A very foul smell is around that omission of information
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where are the results for Medicare?<br />
The AMA report on claim denials shows Medicare claim denials &#8211; why was Medicare kept off of the Administrative Burden Index?<br />
A very foul smell is around that omission of information</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>