On Tuesday, January 24, 2017, the Senate Committee on Finance held a hearing to consider the nomination of Representative Thomas Price, M.D., to be Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The hearing was the last for Dr. Price before the entire Committee holds its formal vote on confirmation and provided key insights to Representative Price’s views on healthcare reform, from the Affordable Care Act (ACA) repeal and replace to Medicare and Medicaid reform.
The hearing somewhat highlighted the division between the political parties, with Democrats focusing on concerns surrounding Representative Price’s healthcare investments, his previous statements on health policy, and his legislative record combating the ACA. On the other hand, Republican support for Representative Price remained strong, and he seems to be on track for confirmation some time over the next couple of weeks.
Opening Remarks
In his opening remarks, Senate Finance Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch offered glowing remarks on Representative Price’s qualifications to lead HHS, noting that he has the “experience and qualifications necessary to effectively lead this large and diverse set of agencies.” Chairman Hatch noted numerous stakeholder organizations that have “enthusiastically” supported Price’s nomination, including the American Medical Association, the American Hospital Association, and the Healthcare Leadership Council.
Senator Hatch also criticized Senate Democrats for their “grossly exaggerated attacks” on Representative Price’s record, attempting to derail his nomination. “I have never seen a party in the Senate – from its leaders on down – publicly commit to not only opposing virtually every nomination, but to attacking and maligning virtually every single nominee,” noted Chairman Hatch.
Senate Finance Committee Ranking Member Ron Wyden voiced concerns surrounding Representative Price’s nomination for HHS Secretary. Senator Wyden pointed to the Trump Administration’s promises not to cut Medicare and Medicaid, noting that the President’s positions are in contrast with Representative Price’s policy positions.
Senator Wyden labeled Representative Price’s ACA replacement plan as “repeal and run,” stating that if it became law, “18 million Americans would lose their health care plans in less than two years.” Senator Wyden expressed concern the future of women’s health and coverage for individuals with pre-existing conditions if Representative Price’s replacement bill were enacted.
In his opening remarks, Representative Price spoke fondly about his time as a physician and legislator in the Georgia State Assembly, highlighting his experience in strengthening children’s healthcare throughout his tenure. Representative Price also complimented HHS’ “incredible work” in the areas of drug treatment research, as well as food safety. Representative Price commented on his frustrations with the current healthcare system, noting that the system has lost focus on its top priority: the patient. He emphasized a “bipartisan, team-driven” policy when it comes to reforming healthcare, calling for a “patient first” system that strengthens medical innovation, accessibility, and choice.
Discussion and Commentary
Affordable Care Act
Senate Democrats harped on several different issues related to repeal and replace of the ACA, especially focused on the ACA’s individual mandate and the ban on denying coverage based on pre-existing conditions. Representative Price strongly stated that Republicans will not “abandon” people with pre-existing conditions as the Republican-led Congress makes plans to repeal and replace the law. Additionally, Representative Price voiced support for extending funding for the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP).
Representative Price noted that he would not commit to utilizing the executive order issued by President Trump to eliminate the ACA individual mandate, nor did he promise that no one would lose coverage because of the executive order. “I’m humble enough to appreciate and understand that I don’t have all the answers,” Representative Price said, stating that “the people in the department have incredible knowledge and expertise.” Additionally, Representative Price did not comment on whether HHS would wait for Congress to prepare a replacement plan before taking steps to dismantle the ACA, noting that he would promise to put “patients at the center of healthcare.”
Sunshine Act
During the hearing, Senator Chuck Grassley went into detail about the Sunshine Act that he worked hard to implement. Senator Grassley noted that several years back, he worked hard to get the Patient Physician Sunshine Act passed in Congress, and that it took the prior Administration several years to get the Act in full swing, working the way it was intended. Senator Grassley questioned Dr. Price as to whether he would help support an expansion of the Sunshine Act, to include nurse practitioners and others, because he feels that the increased transparency is truly a good thing for patients and the healthcare industry as a whole.
When Dr. Price responded, he did not give a yes or no answer, instead opting to note that he does believe transparency is vital in so many different ways in health care, including drug pricing and industry interactions, so that patients can understand what is going on in the health care system.
Medicare and Medicaid Reform
Throughout Representative Price’s confirmation process, Democrats have emphasized that his position on Medicare and Medicaid is at odds with President Trump’s promise not to cut either program. In the Senate hearing, Representative Price stated that Medicare must be reformed if the government wishes to keep its promise to seniors, while avoiding questions surrounding his support of reforming Medicaid into a block grant program, only commenting that he is in favor of turning Medicaid into a system “that responds to patients, not government.”
Representative Price indicated some support for the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI), calling it “vehicle that might help” incentivize innovation. At the same time, however, he also argued that the directives and programs from CMMI should not be mandatory, and that the center’s work had “gotten a bit off track” during the previous Administration.