Resolving Conflicts of Interest in CME

0 1,200

With increased focus on transparency and reporting or monitoring conflicts of interest (COI), there is more and more pressure on all stakeholders in the healthcare industry, particularly continuing medical education (CME) providers and supporters, to manage and reduce potential COIs.  While the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) Standards for Commercial Support (SCS) provide clear guidelines for accredited CME providers, sometimes providers and staff can forget to pay attention to the planners of the activity in advance, and end up resolving their conflicts with content review at the end of the planning process, rather than prior to the development of the activity.

As recently pointed out by Meetings.net, ACCME requirements state that all individuals who influence content must participate in the provider’s process to identify and resolve relevant conflicts of interest.  The article noted that “more attention [is] being paid to planner resolution during ACCME site surveys” and “some instances of noncompliance for ACCME Criterion 7 have arisen out of the lack of satisfactory planner resolution early in the planning process.” 

“The selection of the lead planner, the course chair, should be made with eyes wide open relative to his or her financial relationships,” the author writes.  “Because the planning team usually shapes the activity content—they select the topics, faculty, venue, formats, etc.—making the right choices early on in the planning process is critical.”  “Since the planners are the content experts, it’s not really an option to exclude them from participating.”  In order to ensure that potential conflicts are resolved and the planners’ relationships do not unduly affect the content of the course, the article provides several practical tips for identifying and resolving planner COI: 

  • Let the course directors/planners know the requirements for disclosing relevant conflicts of interest and for their participation in the process; consider a planner/faculty agreement form that requires independence from relevant COI. 
  • Inform senior management about the need to ensure the content is based on valid needs assessment data and not driven by faculty/planner selection. As a starting point, consider revising your policy on the identification of financial relationships and resolution of COI to include clear direction on planner issues and processes. 
  • Think about the issue of planner conflicts the minute you start planning an activity. Choose a course chair and other planners who don’t have conflicts in the first place, or who have minimal conflicts. If this is not possible, consider adding a non-conflicted planner to the committee to serve as a check-and-balance for the conflicted planner. 
  • Collect financial relationship information from planners early enough so that their relevant COI can be resolved, or if resolution is not possible, they can be replaced.
    If you work in a hospital or academic center, ask the CME committee to review the activity to ensure that content is not influenced by planners’ relationships and that it is driven by the physicians’ need for further education on the specific topic. 
  • Limit the conflicted planners’ involvement to aspects of planning that are not related to the reported conflict. 
  • Partner the conflicted planner with a non-conflicted planner to ensure reported relationships do not influence the selection of content, formats, faculty, or any other aspect of the course. 
  • Document, document, document! Consider using a COI management documentation form, which you maintain in the activity’s file. The form provides evidence of how you resolved planner COI. 

Ultimately, the author emphasized the importance of clearly identifying planners (and all other persons who affect the content of CME) by type of participant (i.e., planner, faculty, reviewer, writer, etc.) and to provide this information to the learners prior to the commencement of the activity in course materials or in the opening slides.   

Meetings.net has developed samples of documents to assist CME providers in maintaining compliance with these rules, including a sample faculty/planner agreement, a sample policy, and a documentation of resolution of COI form.  You should contact them directly if you would like a copy.

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.